The dominance of Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. (CATL) in the global electric vehicle (EV) battery market is undeniable, and its growing influence has put it at the center of geopolitical concerns. Known for its leading position in EV battery supply chains, CATL powers about one in three electric cars worldwide. However, recent scrutiny from the US Department of Defense has brought attention to the risks associated with the company’s market dominance, sparking fears of potential disruptions to the global automotive industry.
CATL’s Market Share and Global Reach
With a commanding market share of around 37% in 2024, CATL remains the world’s largest EV battery supplier, well ahead of its Chinese rival BYD Co., which holds a 17% share. The combination of CATL’s market position and its wide customer base, including giants like Tesla, Ford, Volkswagen, Stellantis, and Honda, highlights its pivotal role in the EV sector. The company’s batteries are integral to the production of electric cars around the globe, making any disruption to its operations a significant concern for automakers.
CATL’s control over such a substantial portion of the market means that a shift away from its supply could be a logistical and financial challenge for many companies. Finding an alternative supplier capable of matching CATL’s scale, reliability, and technological expertise would likely prove difficult.
Geopolitical Scrutiny and Blacklisting
The company’s centrality in global supply chains has made it a target for geopolitical scrutiny. In August 2024, the US Department of Defense added CATL to its list of Chinese military companies, an action that followed pressure from Republican lawmakers. The listing primarily affects CATL’s ability to supply the US military, but its consequences extend beyond this, given the reputational damage such a designation brings.
While CATL has strongly denied any military connections, stating that it does not engage in military-related activities, the inclusion of CATL on the blacklisted list raises questions about the company’s ties to China’s government and military. This designation could deter US companies from continuing to do business with CATL, even if the company’s activities are not directly related to defense. The broader issue is the potential reputational hit that could spread through the global supply chain, impacting consumer trust and leading to supply chain disruptions.
The Impact on the EV Industry
The timing of the blacklisting is particularly challenging for CATL, which is planning a second initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong in 2025, potentially raising up to $5 billion. The company’s share price took a hit following the announcement of its inclusion on the black list, falling by as much as 6.1% in China. As CATL prepares for its IPO, the negative publicity surrounding its blacklisting could reduce investor confidence and complicate its fundraising efforts.
Moreover, Citibank noted that 4% of CATL’s total battery shipments in 2023 were directed to the US, and 35% of its energy-storage batteries were supplied to the American market. The blacklisting of CATL could disrupt US companies’ ability to source energy-storage solutions from the company, with potential repercussions for the broader energy sector.
Risks for the EV Supply Chain
For automakers reliant on CATL’s batteries, any disruption to the company’s operations could have wide-reaching consequences. In fact, there are already signs of tension. For example, Duke Energy Corp. was reportedly planning to phase out energy-storage batteries from CATL at one of the US’s largest Marine Corps bases. This indicates that even companies not directly involved in the automotive industry are reevaluating their relationships with the Chinese battery supplier in light of potential security concerns.
If automakers are forced to seek alternative suppliers, it would lead to significant disruptions, given that CATL and BYD together account for over half of the global EV battery market. While BYD could provide an option for some companies, many of CATL’s customers would struggle to find comparable suppliers who can meet the same demand and technical specifications.
Conclusion
CATL’s vast presence in the global EV battery market highlights both the opportunities and risks posed by its market dominance. While the company is an essential player in the global transition to electric vehicles, the geopolitical tensions surrounding its operations could create significant challenges for automakers and other industries relying on its products. As the US-China trade relationship continues to evolve and geopolitical tensions mount, the reputational and supply chain risks associated with CATL’s market share could have profound implications for the future of the global automotive and energy sectors.
Related topics：
